Dear Sir or Madam,
I had a telephone conversation with a planning official on May 17th where I was a prospective house purchaser discussing what was happening in West Drove South to be told that over and above the construction work currently being undertaken more construction had been “agreed”.
Does the Planning Dept have a view on the matter of prospective house purchasers being privy to more information than their constituent householders? Would the owner of properties for sale in West Drove South be correct in their assumption that ‘planning blight’ prevails presently? Does the council have a view on West Drove South residents being victimised in this way typifying the very heart of the problem David Cameron made public on May 31st with regards to the lack of transparency in public services?
Would the planning department now like to come clean on what it has AGREED for West Drove South especially in view of the Highways Dept repositioning speed restriction signs in the lane in the next 2/3 weeks?
‘What it has agreed’ and ‘repositioning of speed restriction signs’ are very strong indicators of an arrogance that may be overplayed, it’s certainly indicative of contempt for due process. I am looking forward very much indeed to your reply.
Yours
No comments:
Post a Comment